Hello, dear dairy. Can you imagine how many people in the world read “Dear John”? They are millions. So, I decided to learn what they think about this book. Look at this message:
“Dear John is trademark Nicholas Sparks--romantic, sappy, sad and redeeming. But the characters and plot are not particularly memorable. Recommended for those who like sappy romantic comedies (or tragedies, in Sparks' case), but not for those who like a little meat in their reading. The interactions between John and his father create a nice sub-plot and the descriptions of North Carolina were interesting to me, but that's probably just because I live in the state.
Overall, if you need some beach reading, go ahead and borrow it. It will give you a few hours to escape, if nothing else.”
You know I agree with this person that descriptions of North Carolina were great and very detailed and that John’s relationship with his father made the store more interesting and saturated. But I cannot agree that this book give you nothing more than a few hours to escape. The author try to explain to readers that true love exists. And that to love means making other people happy and finding your own happiness in it. True love does not tolerate selfish. If you can read a book without any difficulties it does not mean that it is the beach reading. May be, this review’s author did not understand something or the main characters’ behavior made him to doubt about this book’s value.
Этот комментарий был удален автором.
ОтветитьУдалитьOlya, you are trully yourself in your blog. Everything here remimd me you. The style, the language and even the book you've chosen. Your blog is so romantic that I even cannot say something negative about it. You know you should work on your vocabulary and on the usage of tenses.
ОтветитьУдалитьBut all in all I like your blog so much that I really want to read you book.
Can I borrow it for some time? ;-)
Mind your mistakes:
ОтветитьУдалитьthis book give; The author try to explain> Pr simple +s 3d p/ sing
True love does not tolerate selfish> the selfish (substantivised adj) or selfishness (noun)
it is the beach reading> defin/ article is not necessary here
this review’s author;this book’s value> we can't use possessive case here. Use of-phrase instead
made him to doubt > bare infinitive (without to) after make
Please, correct your mistakes in your post.